From this we can infer the following about scholarly research:

“A key guiding principle of interdisciplinary analysis is that no piece of scholarly
research is perfect. If we accept that no scholarly method can guide a researcher
flawlessly towards insight, then it follows that scholarly results may reflect
researcher biases. This does not mean that results reflect only such biases, as some
in the field of science studies have claimed. But it does mean that one way of
evaluating the insights generated by research is to interrogate researcher bias”

1. No scholarly research is perfect because it is skewed by predispositions
and biases.
2. Research is a matter of mere opinion or flawed approach.
3. All researchers, including interdisciplinary researchers, should be
transparent in their biases.
4. Researcher bias should be included in the criteria we use to evaluate our
own work, as well as the work of others.

a. Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct.
b. Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct.
c. Only statement 2 is correct.
d. No statements are correct.

a. Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct.