Dainton and Zelley suggest that context can influence the nature of communication as well as expectations for and understanding of communication. Using this suggestion as a jumping-off point, create an example scenario in which context influences the nature of communication, the expectations of that communication, and the understanding of the communication.
What will be an ideal response?
The context or setting greatly influences human communication, the expectations humans have of communication, and how they understand communicative interactions
You might also like to view...
In his book Propaganda, this PR practitioner argued for a new paradigm for public relations: to make a
hero of “the special pleader who seeks to create public acceptance for a particular idea or commodity”: a) Ivy Lee; b) Edward Bernays; c) Samuel Insull; d) Joseph Pulitzer; e) P.T. Barnum
If courts in a state rule that the right of publicity is a property right, that means ______.
a. the right of publicity does not survive a person’s death b. the right of survival protects famous people only c. the right of publicity survives a person’s death d. personal rights survive a person’s death