Happyland is a country devoted to consumption. The inhabitants spend all of their income on pleasurable things and virtually none on capital investment, human or otherwise. Seriousland is frugal, spending very little on consumption and a great deal on human and physical capital. Ten years from now, which country would you prefer to inhabit?

Clearly, Happyland cannot continue in its present state. With no investment, there will be a decline in productivity, and income should decline accordingly. On the other hand, Seriousland is engaged in a course that will generate both productivity and income growth. Over the long run, Seriousland will be a much better place to live.

Economics

You might also like to view...

Which one of the following variables is classified as a leakage in the output-income-spending flow model presented in the text?

Select one: a. Household saving b. Household Consumption c. Income d. Business Investment

Economics

You have $64 to spend on fish (F) and chips (C). Suppose the price per unit of fish (Pf) is $8 and the price of chips (Pc) is $2. Your utility function for fish and chips is given as such that MUc. =  andMUF = are the marginal utilities of F and C. How many units of C and F should you buy to exhaust all income and to maximize utility?

What will be an ideal response?

Economics