How has the U.S. government regulated commerce with Native Americans?
What will be an ideal response?
In general, the United States treats Native Americans as belonging to separate nations, similarly to the way it treats Spain or France; however, it still considers Native Americans "domestic dependent" nations with limited sovereignty. Today, many Native Americans live on reservations set aside for various tribes. In the late 1980s, the federal government authorized Native American tribes to operate gaming facilities. Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, a federal statute that establishes the requirements for conducting casino gambling and other gaming activities on tribal land. This act allows Native Americans to negotiate with the states for gaming compacts and ensures that the states do so in good faith. If a state fails to do so, the tribe can bring suit in federal court, forcing the state to comply. Today, casinos operated by Native Americans can be found in many states. Profits from the casinos have become an important source of income for members of certain tribes.
You might also like to view...
When Coca-Cola carries a different price depending on whether the consumer purchases it in a fine restaurant, a fast-food restaurant, or a vending machine, then this form of price discrimination is known as ________
A) product-form pricing B) loss-leader pricing C) special event pricing D) channel pricing E) location pricing
An informal, voluntary agreement to solve disputes between an investor and his/her broker by utilizing a person to facilitate negotiations between the two parties is called
A) voluntary arbitration. B) binding arbitration. C) mediation. D) litigation.