What are the arguments for and against the line item veto from a political perspective, and why did the Supreme Court declare it unconstitutional? In your view, should Congress try to pass a new line item veto law or constitutional amendment?
What will be an ideal response?
Students should define the line item veto and then describe the political arguments for and against it—including budgetary flexibility, deficit reduction, and presidential encroachment on congressional power/undermining the power of the purse. The Supreme Court ruled that the law was unconstitutional because it gave the president unilateral authority to change the text of legislation, which is not a power granted to the president by the Constitution. Congress cannot alter interbranch constitutional arrangements with legislation; they would need to do so with an amendment. Students should then make a clear argument about whether the line item veto is a good idea.
You might also like to view...
Most Presidential correspondence with the press and media is in the form of _________.
a. Live Interviews b. Written letters c. Pre-taped Interviews d. Pre-written speeches e. Informal Discussions
Discuss the problem-definition and agenda-setting stages of policy making. What are the factors that shape how a problem may be defined? Discuss an example of a public problem that has been framed in varying ways by opposing groups. Second, the authors state, “the mere existence of a problem is no guarantee that it will attract government attention.” What facilitates the movement of certain issues onto the agenda?
What will be an ideal response?