The "Can Government Do Anything Well?" box discusses government versus private sector funding of scientific research and development. What are the major arguments on each side? Which side are you on? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1,Present the arguments in favor of government funding of scientific research and development, including the fact that government can support basic research that is important but may not provide an immediate financial payoff or benefit.
2, Present the arguments in opposition to government funding of research, including the perception of waste, offense to religious beliefs, and research (such as climate change) whose findings may dictate a change of behavior that is unfavorable.
3, Make an argument for which position the student supports, drawing on the ideas presented above.
You might also like to view...
The __________ enabled newspapers to be more financially independent, moving away from the financial support of political parties to profit from an expanded circulation and advertising
a. reliance on home delivery b. yearly subscription fees c. penny press d. quarterly subscription fees
The author argues that public administration is no longer simply a direct execution of governmental programs. Why is this? Does this pose any ethical challenges?
What will be an ideal response?