Questions that require evidence and documentation to establish whether or not the phenomenon exists are considered questions of .

According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model, listeners who elaborate more will be more persuaded

by A) shortcuts that simplify their thinking about the topic. B) evidence and arguments that support the speaker's thesis. C) the speaker's positive ethos. D) extended narratives that support the speaker's position. E) elaborate metaphors that appeal to the listener's emotions.

Explain what it means to say that films from the "art cinema" movement are made and consumed in an industrial context, but titles linked to the Third Cinema movement aren't?

What will be an ideal response?