Why is it important to identify any significantly ambiguous words when reading a legal case?
What will be an ideal response?
When a court relies on a significantly ambiguous word or phrase, it is relying on a term that is capable of having more than one meaning in the context of the facts. Depending on the various meanings the court adopts, the conclusion that a particular judge reaches may seem either consistent or inconsistent with that term (which is often tied to a reason in support of the proffered conclusion). Moreover, ambiguous words used as part of a legal rule can have a substantial impact on the conclusion that naturally flows from a particular set of facts.
You might also like to view...
When a recruiter asks a question that is difficult to answer, what might the recruiter really be looking for?
A) The candidate's ability to construct a logical approach to problem solving B) The candidate's ability to evade uncomfortable situations C) The candidate's ability to discuss hard issues D) The candidate's ability to draw attention away from themselves and refocus on safer or easier topics E) The candidate's ability to deflect a question by countering with a question of their own
The purpose of personal selling is to
A) provide short-term incentives to encourage the purchase or sale of goods and services. B) help a firm to make sales and build customer relationships. C) cultivate long-term customer relationships by employing direct-response techniques. D) obtain favorable publicity in order to build relationships with a firm's publics. E) reach large audiences efficiently through the mass media.