What is the logic underlying Howard and Donnelly's argument that the "spurious" cultural relativity defense serves the interests of the powerful?
a. The basic point about human rights is that they protect the weak against the powerful.
b. At heart, all cultures value the same things, so the claim of relativity must be spurious.
c. Cultural practices are not neutral in their effects and those who benefit have a vested interest in preserving them.
d. Universal human rights must be applied equally, regardless of how much or little power an individual possesses.
c
You might also like to view...
A researcher studies the relationship between political attitudes and income. The researcher finds that those with higher income are more conservative. However, income tends to vary with age (i.e. the older one is the higher the income on average)
The results of the study are A) Scientifically proven. B) Valid. C) Confounded. D) An example of an ex post facto fallacy.
Some interest groups maintain a low profile by promoting their objectives without __________ them
A) lobbying for B) fully funding C) advertising D) openly debating