Studies have shown that political action committees (PACs) contribute disproportionately to incumbent candidates. Why do PACs pursue this strategy in their campaign contributions? Are there any potential drawbacks?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Explain that PACs are strategic in how they invest their funds; they want to get the most impact out of their contributions.
2. Note that incumbent candidates are more likely to win, so groups that donate to PACs are more likely to gain access to elected officials after the election.
3. Explain one or more drawbacks to this strategy, including the possibility that the challenger will win and groups will not have the same type of access to the newly elected officials.
You might also like to view...
The text fears that __________ could follow the same path as Iran due to its relationship between religion and politics
a. Israel b. Slovakia c. Cuba d. Saudi Arabia
Which of the following examples of international law can be said to most closely resemble the notion of natural rights inherent in American political culture?
a. the Anti–Ballistic Missile Treaty b. international trade law c. the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse emissions d. the Peace of Westphalia, which established state sovereignty e. the Universal Declaration of Human Rights