In Time, Inc. v. Hill, the Supreme Court ruled that:

a) celebrities can prevent magazines from publishing information about their private lives; b) the fact that a celebrity is gay is newsworthy and not private; c) public figures must prove negligence to win an invasion of privacy lawsuit; d) a family that was held hostage by escaped convicts had to prove actual malice to win a false light privacy case against a magazine; e) a person’s sex change surgery was newsworthy.

D