Is California "ungovernable"?

What will be an ideal response?

Varies. There is no correct answer to this question, but students should weigh the evidence presented throughout the book regarding California government's structure, and its ability to solve pressing problems that exist on a massive scale. After defining what's meant by governability, they should construct an argument about how well state government's four branches (the people through direct democracy, the legislature, the executive, and the courts) work together to address basic and complex issues that arise from "hyperdiverse" conditions (highly diverse demographics, geography, society, politics, and economics). They might address whether California's hybrid government enables or inhibits "good" governance, and the ability of state officials to lead. Students may also explore this question through the lens of local governments, which are charged with solving problems on a smaller scale. Good answers will analyze how well the state has responded to some specific policy issues; a few are briefly discussed in the book (criminal justice, education, environment, etc.). Other questions implicit in the governability question--and ought to be addressed at some level in the response--could include the following: Given the political, demographic, social, and economic conditions of the state, Can and does government create workable solutions to complex issues? Can and do state officials devise long-range solutions and plan adequately for the future? Can one strong leader "alone" meet these challenges?