In your opinion, are personal attacks effective in political campaigns?
What will be an ideal response?
They seem to be. If they weren't effective, they wouldn't be as widely used in
campaigns as they appear to be. However, personal attacks can backfire and
hurt the credibility of their source. If the attack is based on false or misleading
information, the attack, itself, can become a bigger issue. The constant use of
attack tactics can also create permanent harm to the image of those who use
them. Many political observers said that the major reason President Bill Clinton
wasn't removed from office in 1999 for lying to a federal grand jury had less to
do with his innocence than with the nature of those aligned against him.
You might also like to view...
Internet developers always envisioned a system that could be used by commerce
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. An important constraint on press freedom is the extent to which journalists are under threats of violence. 2. Danger for journalists around the world is on the decline. 3. The only way government in the United States can limit press is through prior restraint. 4. Journalists' reliance on officials as sources is one effective manner of information control. 5. The American public is highly cognizant of First Amendment rights and enthusiastically defend them.