Identify and explain the difference between militant internationalism and cooperative internationalism. How do these concepts align with traditional theories of international relations? Do these perspectives represent larger trends in public opinion?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should identify militant internationalism, aligned with realism, as a form of activism in foreign policy that emphasizes coercive measures, including the use of force, over diplomacy and other peaceful means of statecraft. Answers should identify cooperative internationalism, aligned with liberalism, as a form of activism that emphasizes diplomacy and multilateral collaboration rather than military confrontation. Answers should also identify how militant and cooperative internationalism represents a more subtle difference in the level of international trust felt by individuals and explain the consequences of a lack of international trust by the majority of Americans.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements is true?
A) No more than four factors can be included in a factorial design. B) Interactions with up to ten factors can be readily interpreted. C) Any number of factors can be included, but interpretation of interactions is more difficult as the number of factors increases. D) The number of factors has no bearing on the interpretation of results.
Interest groups may lobby the Supreme Court via
a. the solicitor general. b. petitions to their representatives in Congress. c. amicus curiae briefs. d. fund raising. e. the President.