Which of the following would be a supervening event from the standpoint of a car manufacturer

that has been sued in strict liability for an injury caused by one of its cars?

A) An enactment, after the date of the injury, of a new safety regulation that would have
prevented the injury
B) A redesign of the particular model car such that the ones being currently manufactured
do not have the defect, which led to the injury
C) A recall notice sent to the car owner that was ignored
D) The fact that the defect was caused by the car dealer when the car dealer was installing
accessories for the purchaser

D