What is one of the consequences of the effort to shape and channel public opinion?
A. The line between campaigning and governing has blurred because presidents are more reliant on grassroots public support for winning policy battles.
B. As the White House takes a more aggressive stand in shaping public opinion, it has limited the opportunities for outside forces to participate.
C. It has resulted in greater fragmentation of the political attitudes Americans hold because there are so many competing messages.
D. It has reduced political efficacy because Americans only see competing efforts to shape opinions rather than a real dialogue on the issues.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is within the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court?
a. federal criminal matters b. tax disputes c. military tribunals d. cases prosecuting diplomats
The experience with 527 organizations in the 2004 elections suggests that campaign finance laws
A) are an effective way to minimize interest group participation. B) are an effective way to reduce campaign spending. C) facilitate coordination of efforts between candidates and groups. D) are not likely to take money out of politics. E) have restricted speech considerably.