What is the primary difference between the realist and liberal/constructivist view of international law?
a. Realists contend that international law benefits all participants; liberals and constructivists think international law is rigged in favor of the powerful.
b. Realists are doubtful about the effectiveness of international law; liberals and constructivists believe international law is a way to create trust between states.
c. Realists see international law as a means of mitigating international conflicts; liberals and constructivists do not accept that international law is binding.
d. Realists believe international law creates harmony; liberals and constructivists consider international law anarchic.
b. Realists are doubtful about the effectiveness of international law; liberals and constructivists believe international law is a way to create trust between states.
You might also like to view...
In a welfare state, ________
A. all economic activity is undertaken outside the purview of the state B. all individuals and private corporations are free to invest in economic activities autonomously C. all public sector expenditure undertaken by the government is categorized as welfare spending D. the government regulates the delivery of goods and services to the people E. the overall size of the public sector is measured by the amount of foreign direct investment witnessed by the country
Power that the Texas governor lacks is
a. pocket veto. b. line-item veto. c. reduction veto. d. directive authority. e. Both options A and C are true.