How did Miranda v. Arizona change the way law enforcement treated criminal defendants? How has the Supreme Court tinkered with these rights over time?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Discuss the holding of Miranda v. Arizona.
2, Explain what is meant by Miranda rights and how police officers use them.
3, Analyze how hearing the Miranda rights helps a criminal defendant to be more informed about his or her rights as an accused party.
4, Describe how the Miranda decision has been applied by the Supreme Court at different times.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following explains why many interest groups prefer to be governed by boards and commissions?
A. Interest groups believe that they have more influence over these independent offices than those that come directly under a governor's authority. B. Interest groups believe that they have more influence over the governor's appointees than over elected officials. C. Interest groups believe that they already have direct access to the governor's office. D. Interest groups believe that they would have to rebuild their connections to the governor-appointed directors.
Which of the following held the North Atlantic Treaty Organization together?
a. common culture b. shared economy c. the crumbling of other alliances d. the threat of the Soviet Union e. common interests in the Middle East