How do you determine whether a community has been faced with "environmental injustice"?

What will be an ideal response?

There could certainly be some subjective measures into the negative short term and long term impacts a specific facility has in the neighborhood. However, when the costs outweigh the environmental benefits of the facility, it could be concluded that environmental injustice has taken place. NIMBY is an effective concept with the assumption that the neighborhood has the coordinating power to try to block negative environmental investments in the local community, As a result, in another level of environmental justice, those neighborhoods that have the resources to establish a protection campaign and threaten legal action if necessary have higher odds of winning the blockage of a facility which would result in a negative environmental impact. Therefore, the neighborhoods that do not have the resources to mount an effective campaign will have these negative impact environmental facilities placed in their own backyards.