In EEOC v AutoZone, the EEOC sued AutoZone on behalf of an employee who suffered injury and disability because his employer would not provide a reasonable accommodation for his disability. Fed Ex argued that the damages awarded by the jury were too high, and also offered evidence of its ADA compliance policy set forth in the employee manual. The court ruled:
a. for the defendant AutoZone, since the establishment of an ADA compliance policy was sufficient to establish a good faith effort to comply with the ADA
b. for the defendant AutoZone, because plaintiff had not established that he suffered from a disability
c. for the plaintiff because the damages awarded were consistent with the damages awarded in other cases
d. for the plaintiff because he established that he suffered from a disability
C
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements about Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans is (are) true?
I. Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans can be organized on a nonprofit basis or on a for-profit basis. II. Blue Cross provides coverage for hospital services; Blue Shield provides coverage for physicians' and surgeons' fees. A) I only B) II only C) both I and II D) neither I nor II
Economic growth, as measured by increases in the gross domestic product (GDP) signals the start of a bull market where stock prices are bound to rise
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.