What liabilities are placed on states or person, by international conventions, for causing environmental damage?
What will be an ideal response?
There are a few conventions that impose liability on persons who cause damage to the environment. These conventions, in general, define the nature of the liability, the persons who are liable, and the extent of their liability. Thus, with respect to damage resulting from the use of nuclear materials, the operators of nuclear installations are made "absolutely and exclusively" liable for any damage they cause. This includes continuing liability for damage that occurs while nuclear materials are being transported by ship from one installation to another. States parties are allowed to set liability limits, but these can be no less than 5 million U.S. gold-based dollars. Similar rules apply to marine oil pollution. The operators of oil tankers or other ships that pollute the ocean with oil are liable "regardless of fault or negligence" up to a maximum limit of 59.7 million Special Drawing Rights (about U.S. $76.5 million), depending on the tonnage of the ship. Victims who suffer damages exceeding this amount can seek additional compensation from an International Fund for Compensation of Oil Pollution Damage.
You might also like to view...
The major argument in favor of an optional federal charter for insurers is that
A) small insurers need a national charter to be competitive with large insurers. B) a federal charter will prevent insurer insolvencies. C) a federal charter will provide greater oversight of insurer market practices. D) national insurers are at a competitive disadvantage under the present system.
Performance appraisal requires that managers take on the role of a _____
a. interrogator b. therapist c. coach d. friend e. all of the above