Which of these would be considered a reason in favor of Texas having more publicly funded campaigns?
a. State support of candidates would free them of dependence on special interests
b. Citizens would be forced to subsidize candidates whose views many citizens would strongly disagree with.
c. Publicly funded campaigns would be limited to general elections; primary elections would still be dependent on special interests.
d. If publicly funded campaigns were limited to major parties, it would suppress the expression of alternative views.
e. If publicly funded campaigns were open to all parties, it would provide incentive for small fringe groups to claim subsidies to publicize their extremist views.
a
You might also like to view...
Federal Courts have applied the 1964 Civil Rights Act in which of the following contexts?
a. reducing racial segregation in housing b. workplace discrimination against gays and lesbians c. sexual harassment in the workplace d. use of race as a factor in university admissions
Policy and political differences in states and communities are mainly attributed to ________._
A. the size of the federal government B. the educational system C. the mobility of the residents D. racial and ethnic composition