What did the Supreme Court decide in Korematsu v. United States (1944) regarding the internment of American citizens of Japanese ancestry living on the west coast of the United States?
a. It was legally permissible.
b. It was unconstitutional, and Japanese Americans must be duly compensated.
c. It did not pass the strict scrutiny test, and the internment was promptly terminated. –
d. It was unconstitutional, but it was too late to do anything about it.
a
You might also like to view...
Why did the British, French, and Italians fail to reach a consensus response to the German threat in their meeting at Stresa?
a. They disagreed radically on the level of the German threat. b. The British were lured away by a German offer of a naval treaty. c. The French secured a new security pact with the Soviet Union. d. The Germans withdrew from the Rhineland to prevent provoking a response. e. The Germans absorbed Austria, frightening the Italians into a mutual security pact.
Which of the following individuals would be eligible to serve as Texas governor, according to the state constitution?
A) A 30-year-old U.S. citizen who has resided in Texas for five years. B) A 25-year-old U.S. citizen who has resided in Texas for seven years. C) A 35-year-old U.S. citizen who has resided in Texas for two years. D) A 40-year-old Mexican citizen who has resided in Texas for twenty years.