In the past, medical studies about racial differences were used to justify immigration restrictions, slavery, and other social inequalities.

One type of argument which can be made against a proposal for change is referred

to as a "disadvantage" argument. Which of the following things is NOT true of a disadvantage argument? (a) It visualizes the world as if the advocate's proposal were adopted. (b) It suggests that the proposal would have no effect if adopted. (c) It is argued using the claims of effect, significance, and inherency. (d) It has the same requirements for proof that any other argument would have.

What are two questions would you like to ask when it comes to new tools and technologies?

What will be an ideal response?