Due to ongoing drought conditions, many cities in Texas have implemented water conservation measures which prevent homeowners from watering their lawns more than two times per month. Prior to the drought conditions, no restrictions were in place
Discuss this measure from the villain/victim standpoint. Explain who the villains and victims are, and if they really are villains and victims?
The "villains" are those people who use "too much" water on their lawns, and the "victims" are those people who want to use the water for other things. This is actually just a dispute over the best use of a resource between people with competing preferences. As a result of the restrictions, people have dry, brown lawns and dying shrubs in their gardens. Without the restrictions, other people may not have been permitted to wash their cars or keep their swimming pools filled. Much of this dispute could be avoided if water were priced in the marketplace instead of by municipalities, as that would direct water to its most valued uses and encourage conservation.
You might also like to view...
Suppose that the price elasticity of demand for snow shovels is –1.2 . What would have to happen to the price of a snow shovel for the quantity demanded to fall from 2,000 to 1,800? Use the midpoint formula in your calculations
What will be an ideal response?
Holding your income and the price of lobster constant, you can derive your demand curve for steak from an indifference curve/budget line diagram by determining how your consumption of steak changes when the price of a steak changes
Indicate whether the statement is true or false