During the early 1930s there were a number of bank failures in the United States. What did this do to the money supply? The New York Federal Reserve Bank advocated open market purchases. Would these purchases have reversed the change in the money supply and helped banks? Explain
Bank failures cause people to lose confidence in the banking system so that deposits fall and banks have less to lend. Further, under these circumstances banks are probably more cautious about lending. Both of these reactions would tend to decrease the money supply. Open market purchases increase bank reserves and so would have at least made the decrease smaller. The increase in reserves would also have provided banks with greater liquidity to meet the demands of customers who wanted to make withdrawals. In short, while the actions of depositors and banks lowered the money supply, the Fed could have increased it by buying bonds.
You might also like to view...
If a perfectly competitive market becomes a monopoly and the costs do not change, which of the following allocations of costs and benefits applies?
A) The producer benefits, but consumers and society are harmed. B) The producer and society are harmed, but consumers benefit. C) The producer and society benefit, but consumers are harmed. D) The producer is harmed, but consumers and society benefit.
Which of the following is a reason not to join a monetary union?
A) the loss of national identity B) the loss of seignorage C) a lack of fiscal integration D) All of these are reasons not to join.