What was the purpose of earmark reform? Was it successful?
What will be an ideal response?
Earmark reform was intended to introduce more accountability and transparency into the earmark process, and Congress even banned earmarks all together in 2011. However, members have used other practices to get around the earmark ban but still provide benefits to their constituents, such as phonemarking or soft earmarking.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements is NOT true concerning the role of issues in citizens’ voting decisions?
a. People tend to tune out the “complicated” issues. b. The media do not generally cover issues in depth. c. Calculated policy decisions by voters are common. d. Most voters rely on party labels to tell them what they need to know about candidates. e. People are influenced by policy information.
Texan's treatment of ______________ was indicative of the vitriolic divisions over slavery and secession in Texas during the Civil War
a. Francis Lubbock b. Edward Clark c. Sam Houston d. Albert Sidney Johnston