It is interesting to note that several countries around the world actually make voting compulsory.According to the CIA's World Factbook, as of August 2013, voting is mandatory in 22 countries

Although this law is not enforced in many of these countries, in several nations citizens who do not comply are subject to fines. Give arguments for and against making voting compulsory.

A well-reasoned response should note at least some of the following arguments:
Arguments For
Forcing citizens to vote results in a greater sense of political legitimacy regarding the outcome.The results of an election or referendum would genuinely reflect the preferences of a wider segment of society.
It could conceivably be more difficult for extremist or fringe candidates to be elected or have a significant impact on the political system.
It can heighten public awareness of the political process and foster participation in other political activities.
There is possibly less scope for corruption in that politicians do not have to spend money to "get out the vote."
Arguments Against
Compelling citizens to vote is a serious infringement on their freedom and extends the scope of state power to compel certain behaviors.
The political legitimacy conferred by compulsory voting may serve to mask an authoritarian or totalitarian regime.If the state also controls which candidates can seek election, then a compelled turnout will merely put a democratic gloss on a very undemocratic process.For example, North Korea has compelled voting for many years but only approved candidates can run.However, the regime trumpets the results as proof of the overwhelming majority support for the Communist dictatorship.
A-head: CONTROLLING POLITICIANS
Concept:Electoral Controls on Politicians