Describe situations in which an organization should buy rather than build software components
What will be an ideal response?
It is invariably cheaper to buy reusable components and very expensive to develop them. Software vendors can afford to invest heavily in developing components because they hope to recoup the expense in the marketplace. Businesses who develop software for in-house use, with few exceptions, cannot afford to do so. Besides, you can spend tens of millions of dollars to create an in-house data management system, but it is unlikely that the resulting product would compare favorably with a battle-tested DBMS from established vendors, even if it has some interesting or clever features. On the other hand, using an off-the-shelf component means that the continued health of your system is now dependent on the continued health of the outside vendor and its ability to provide timely updates.
You might also like to view...
What is meant by the rights ethic in ethical decision-making?
What will be an ideal response?
The following information comes from the Galaxy Construction balance sheet
The value of common stock is $10,000, retained earnings equals $7,000, total common equity equals $17,000, preferred stock has a value of $3,000, and long-term debt totals $15,000. If the cost of debt is 8.00%, preferred stock has a cost of 10.00%, common stock has a cost of 12.00%, and the firm has a corporate tax rate of 30%, calculate the firm's WACC adjusted for taxes. A) 10.11% B) 10.00% C) 9.09% D) There is not enough information to answer this question.