Some might say that coding is not as important as analysis or design since programming errors can be identified and corrected easily. Do you agree with this statement? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
Coding is the realization of analysis and design: no code means no software. On the other hand, coding without robust analysis and design cannot lead to quality software. Both sides of the equation are equally important. Code is the brick and the mortar of a software product. High-quality software cannot result from low-quality code. Coding follows and depends on physical design. In turn, coding might force the physical design to change if it shows that certain design concepts are defective, missing, or ignorant of technological realities. As important as analysis and design are, coding should not be taken for granted. High-quality software cannot result from low-quality code.
You might also like to view...
If the insured has any incidents of ownership in a life insurance policy when he or she dies, the entire proceeds are included in his or her gross estate for federal estate tax purposes.
a. true b. false
A toaster manufacturer who has invested $1 million in the business wants to set a price to earn a 20 percent return on investment, specifically $200,000. What pricing method should it choose?
What will be an ideal response?