What is presidential style and how has it been reflected by presidents of the mid-to-late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries?

What will be an ideal response?

Presidential style refers to the image portrayed by presidents that symbolizes who the president represents for the American people as well as for foreign leaders. Style differences between presidents are quite real but they are also carefully cultivated. Harry Truman was known for his direct, and at times, profane use of language, as well as his no-nonsense approach to decision making. Conversely, Dwight Eisenhower portrayed himself as someone who stood above the ugliness of day-to-day politics. John F. Kennedy and his administration emphasized the concepts of youth and energy. Following the corruption and unease of Watergate and Richard Nixon’s resignation, Jimmy Carter’s style promised honesty and competence in the American government. Ronald Reagan offered optimism and a grandfatherly presence.
Following Reagan, Bill Clinton’s style emphasized intellect and compassion, whereas his successor, George W. Bush represented the antithesis of Clinton’s intellect. Bush seemed more concerned with results than academics. Bush also invoked a high moral tone in his presidency that was largely absent during Clinton’s term. Barack Obama brought an even-keeled, introverted disposition to the office. This approach was an amalgamation of several of his predecessors: Reagan’s optimism, Clinton’s intellect, and Bush’s faith and commitment to family. Donald Trump brought a brash and flamboyant style to the White House. Presidential styles, while quite varied, remain a subtle, or not so subtle, means though which presidents communicate. Despite their careful cultivation, perceptions of a president’s style can often fluctuate and often times they are impacted by issues outside the control of the president himself.