The central legislative dilemma for Congress is combining the faithful representation of constituents with making effective public policy
Explore what both supporters and critics contend in their assessments of Congress as it attempts to be both a representative and an objective policymaking institution.
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Explain that supporters see Congress as a forum in which many interests compete for a spot on the policy agenda and over the form of a particular policy—just as the Founders intended.
2, Explain that critics charge that Congress is too representative—so representative that it is incapable of taking decisive action to deal with difficult problems.
3, Explain that supporters of Congress point out that, thanks to its being decentralized, there is no oligarchy in control to prevent the legislature from taking comprehensive action.
4, Explain that critics say that government spends too much because Congress is protecting the interests of too many people; as long as each interest tries to preserve the status quo, Congress cannot enact bold reforms.
You might also like to view...
Litigants have an automatic right of appeal to the Supreme Court
Indicate whether this statement is true or false?
Why did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention opt for ratification to occur through ratifying conventions rather than state legislatures?
a. As the states had more power under the Articles of Confederation, they had more to lose if the Constitution was ratified. b. Travel was challenging and relay of information slow. Ratifying conventions were close to each other so problems could be mitigated and concerns addressed efficiently. c. The delegates wanted to ensure that legislators were included. d. The delegates arranged to have ratification occur in the most open forums possible.