Buster and Rover formed a partnership to invest in real estate. However, Buster also decided to sell TVs on the side. Buster went to Harold, a wholesaler, and purchased 20 TVs on credit in the name of the partnership. Harold knew the partnership was formed for the purpose of investing in real estate because he had been solicited to be one of the partners. If Buster does not pay for the TVs,
A. The partnership is liable because Buster had apparent authority to sign for the TVs as a partner.
B. As a partner, Rover is personally liable to Harold.
C. Harold can seize Buster's partnership interest and collect his or her profits.
D. The partnership is not liable because it is not a trading partnership.
Answer: D. The partnership is not liable because it is not a trading partnership.
You might also like to view...
In which of the following forms of concurrent ownership may one party unilaterally transfer her
portion without the consent of the other party(ies)? A) Join tenancy B) Tenancy in common C) Tenancy by the entirety D) A, B, and C E) A and B only
All of the following are examples of economic factors except ________
A) exchange rates B) interest rates C) birth rates D) inflation rates