Why might an agreement to address climate change be better served by a narrow membership than by a broad one?
a. Most of the world's countries have no interest in an agreement.
b. It would eliminate the problem of the low compliance to the agreement.
c. The more members there are, the more complex the negotiations and the more difficult it is to reach an agreement.
d. If membership is restricted to the most powerful countries, any agreement can then be imposed on all other countries.
e. Broad membership would inevitably include the United States, and the United States has no interest in addressing this problem.
Answer: c
You might also like to view...
Which is true of the War Powers Resolution (1973) as written?
a. It runs counter to the intentions of the Framers by diminishing the separation of powers between the two branches of government in favor of Congress. b. It gives Congress the power to wage war without the president's consent c. It gives the president the power to wage short-term wars without congressional approval. d. It gives the president absolute discretion in allocating how funds are used in war.
About how many special districts are estimated to exist in Texas, not including school districts?
What will be an ideal response?