Cigarette advertising on our nation's radio and television stations has been prohibited for more than the past three decades by federal law
What is curious about this law is that it came into being not just because of the lobbying efforts of American Medical Association but also by the tobacco industry. Use economic logic to explain this apparent paradox.
The tobacco industry has been dominated by a handful of firms for many decades and advertised heavily prior to the passage of this law. To survive, each firm responds in kind. If one firm drops out of the race, it will certainly lose out. Advertising of this sort may not increase demand for the product or improve profitability for the industry. Instead, it is often a "zero sum game"—a game in which the sum of the gains equals the sum of the losses. Tobacco company executives likely realized this "zero sum game" character of their advertising efforts and rightly understood that the only way to increase industry-wide profits would be if everyone were prevented from advertising. This could only be achieved through law.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is likely to cause a decrease in the natural rate of unemployment?
A) an increase in the percentage of the working-age population receiving disability insurance B) a decrease in the use of temporary workers C) a growing percentage of young workers in the labor force D) generous unemployment insurance benefits
When a Nash equilibrium is reached:
A. the outcome will only change if the "lead" player changes his strategy. B. no one has an incentive to break the equilibrium by changing his strategy. C. it must be true that all players have a dominant strategy. D. None of these statements is true.