Briefly explain how the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Republican Party of Minnesota v. White changed judicial elections
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response would be:
In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Republican Party of Minnesota v. Whitethat "announce clauses" violated judicial candidates' rights under the First Amendment. As a result, judges have felt freer to take stances on controversial political issues like the death penalty, same-sex marriage, or funding for education. This, in turn, has increased turnout in judicial elections.
You might also like to view...
Which of these statements most likely comes from an advocate of noninterventionism?
a. The United States cannot be isolated in world affairs, but it should use its military capabilities only sparingly. b. The United States should pressure the United Nations to be more assertive in the name of collective security. c. The United States should participate in peacekeeping missions only when there is a clear humanitarian purpose. d. The United States should withdraw from international institutions, but it should continue trading with other nations.
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. A contingency table is an example of a univariate analysis. 2. A contingency table cannot be used to display collapsed data. 3. The first step in analyzing data is to describe an observed pattern 4. The range for collapsed data begins with a low point and includes its upper end point. 5. Individual level conclusions can be drawn from aggregate level data.