In Whalen v. Union Bag & Paper Co, where a paper mill polluted a farmer's creek so he sued to stop the pollution, the court held that:

a. enjoining the defendant from polluting would cause too great an economic loss b. the plaintiff contributed his negligence and so could not sue the defendant
c. the riparian rights of the defendant outweighed the rights of the plaintiff
d. because the defendant acted without malice, no riparian rights were violated e. none of the other choices

e