In Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
a. judicial candidates cannot raise campaign funds from interest groups or from political parties.
b. the Minnesota Supreme Court’s canon of judicial conduct, which prohibited a candidate for judicial office from announcing his or her views on disputed legal or political issues, does not violate the First Amendment freedom of speech.
c. lawyers with business before a court cannot contribute money to judicial candidates.
d. the Minnesota Supreme Court’s canon of judicial conduct, which prohibited a candidate for judicial office from announcing his or her views on disputed legal or political issues, violates the First Amendment freedom of speech.
d. the Minnesota Supreme Court’s canon of judicial conduct, which prohibited a candidate for judicial office from announcing his or her views on disputed legal or political issues, violates the First Amendment freedom of speech.
You might also like to view...
A researcher is interested in studying a sample population, and then applying the findings to the population. This is referred to as:
A. Statistical inference B. Statistical implying C. Statistical coding D. Statistical relevance
The Powell v. Alabama case involving the Scottsboro boys was a landmark case with regard to
A. prayer in public schools. B. the right of police to conduct "reasonable" searches without a warrant. C. the constitutionality of wartime dissent. D. prior restraint. E. right to counsel.