Explain and defend the court's decision in the Tarasoff case
The Tarasoff case involved an outpatient psychiatric patient who told his counselors that he intended to kill a young woman. Although concerned, the clinic staff allowed the young man to go free and did not warn the young woman of her potential danger. The young man killed the young woman and the clinic justified its action of not warning on the basis of confidentiality. The Tarasoff court decision placed a higher value on the protection of a vulnerable individual than on the maintenance of confidentiality. It was a matter of weighing two different principles.
You might also like to view...
Based on the relationship among the A, CO2, and the PACO2, what would be the resultant PACO2 if the CO2 doubled, and the A remained constant?
A. The PACO2 would double. B. The PACO2 would be halved. C. The PACO2 increased by 25%. D. The PACO2 would be unpredictable.
A National Oral Health Surveillance system has been developed based on a set of oral health indicators used by Healthy People 2010
Indicate whether the statement is true or false