Compare and contrast judicial restraint and judicial activism by analyzing how a proponent of each would have decided Brown v. Board of Education
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Explain that a proponent of judicial restraint believes in giving deference to the actions of other branches of government and would only strike down a law that is clearly unconstitutional.
2. Acknowledge that an advocate of judicial restraint would allow segregation to continue as it is not plainly unconstitutional.
3. Explain that a proponent of judicial activism favors broad constitutional interpretation to promote justice and fairness and would, therefore, support the decision in Brown.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a difference between a presidential democracy and a parliamentary democracy?
A. Unlike a presidential democracy, there is no separate law-enforcing branch in a parliamentary democracy. B. Unlike a presidential democracy, there is no separate lawmaking branch in a parliamentary democracy. C. Unlike a presidential democracy, the lawmaking and law-enforcing branches of government are united in a parliamentary democracy. D. Unlike a presidential democracy, the prime minister is separate from the legislative body in a parliamentary democracy. E. Unlike a presidential democracy, the lawmaking branch is superior to the law-enforcing branch of the government in a parliamentary democracy.
Organizations that base the majority of their content on the work of trained reporters are referred to as ______.
A. legacy outlets B. contemporary outlets C. social media platforms D. digital media platforms