It is still the conventional wisdom in the U.S. that compliance with NAFTA requirements is having a deleterious effect on U.S. highway safety standards, on U.S. pollution and other environmental standards, and on U.S. jobs
What facts would proponents of an expansion of NAFTA (e.g., to include all of Central and South American countries) need to marshall in order to convince you?
The answer is subjective. Presumably the answer should include reasonable and objective counter-factual scenarios (what would be the job or pollution situation with and without NAFTA).
You might also like to view...
In the above figure, the economy is initially at point B. If the Fed increases the quantity of money, there is
A) a movement to point C. B) a movement to point A. C) a shift to AD2. D) a shift to AD1.
Lisa consumes only pizzas (P) and burritos (B). Her utility function is U = P0.5 B0.5. The price of per pizza is $10 and the price per burrito is $5. In equilibrium, Lisa consumes 4 pizzas
Using Lisa's utility function, calculate how many burritos she consumes.