What is the legal significance of the distinction between rule of reason violations and per se
violations under the Sherman Act?
A) Rule of reason violations might be proven to be acceptable, but per se violations cannot be
acceptable under any circumstances.
B) Rule of reason violations require an agreement with at least one other party, but per se
violations can occur without an agreement with others.
C) Rule of reason violations must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and per se
violations must be proven with a preponderance of the evidence.
D) Rule of reason violations relate to horizontal situations, and per se violations relate to
vertical situations.
E) Rule of reason violations relate to actions brought by private parties, and per se violations
relate to actions brought by the government.
A
You might also like to view...
A static budget is prepared for only one level of sales volume
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
When the total contribution produced by a pricing strategy is lower, overall profits will also be lower because fixed costs are deducted from the total contribution
Indicate whether the statement is true or false