In a debate, Laura states that corruption in the United States has decreased. She substantiates this claim by comparing the number of instances of bribery of the present year to that of the previous year. In this case, Laura is _____.
a. arguing from analogy
b. arguing from causation
c. arguing from example
d. arguing from sign
b. arguing from causation
In the given scenario, Laura is arguing from causation. Arguing from causation supports a claim by citing evidence that shows one or more events almost always brings about, leads to, creates, or prevents another event or effect.
Communication & Mass Media
You might also like to view...
What part of the argument model helps your audience understand how the evidence your provide
supports your claim? A. Rebuttal B. Argument C. Qualifier D. Warrant
Communication & Mass Media
Each of the eight stages of critical analysis to find a proposition
a. need to be thoroughly examined. b. should always be in the order given in the text. c. may not result in a proposition. d. are of equal importance.
Communication & Mass Media