What competing imperatives surrounded the discussion of the American presidency at the Constitutional Convention?
Discuss how those dueling claims were evidenced in both the debatesabout the presidency and the revision plans proposed by the various delegations.
The ideal answer should:
a. Discuss how the views of some delegates were based on a deep distrust of concentrated power, a belief in the importance of individual liberty, and a recognition of the merits of limited government.
b.Contrast those views with the views of other delegates whoheld that continued individual liberty and power to deal with emergent domestic crises required effective, energetic governance by the national government and a newly empowered presidency.
c.Identify how those competing perspectives led to debate on the presidency in regard to four dimensions: independence of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches; division of powers across the branches; the number of presidents; and the mode of presidential selection and succession.
d.Illustrate how the conflicting visions of the delegates on those four dimensions influenced the development of three different proposals: the Virginia Plan, the British Plan, and the New Jersey Plan.
You might also like to view...
Why was the Hatch Act adopted by Congress in 1939?
A. To encourage federal employees to run for state but not federal government B. To prevent federal employees from switching political parties C. To prohibit federal employees from active involvement in political campaigns D. To increase federal employee participation in running voter registration drives E. To establish a patronage system during the Great Depression
Why are some government programs referred to as entitlements?
a. because benefits are distributed automatically to citizens who meet certain specifications b. because they are benefits available only to the working poor in the United States c. because they are benefits funded through the Title 9 section of the 1965 Civil Rights Act d. because they are benefits that are distributed on a case-by-case basis to select citizens in extreme need