Interpret the Articles of Confederation as a guide for democracy in the United States. Were they successful? Why or why not?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Discuss how the Articles of Confederation were designed to restrict a strong centralized government that might tyrannize the people. For example, the Confederation has been described as a "fragile league of friendship" among states. The nation lacked a national executive, judiciary, or single national currency. The national government had little to no authority over the citizens and relied on the states in matters ranging from taxation to interpreting and enforcing the laws.
2. Describe how, because of the deficiencies, the Articles of Confederation were largely unsuccessful. In the interest of protecting the citizens from government, the country under the Articles of Confederation was ineffective in providing for the citizens or regulating economic issues among the states.
You might also like to view...
The strict procedural rules that govern courts
A. might disallow evidence gathered in an illegal manner. B. allow other states to introduce policy questions. C. limit access to the courts. D. allow them to initiate policies.
Primaries and caucuses differ in that
A. caucuses require more grassroots organization. B. caucuses generally have higher turnout. C. a citizen can participate in both parties' caucuses. D. parties get to select who participates in a caucus.