In the case of UBS Securities Canada v. Sands Brothers Canada, the court held that:
A) There was not an enforceable agreement because the agreement to sell the shares was not in writing.
B) There was not an enforceable agreement because some terms were expressly left to be decided later.
C) There was not an enforceable agreement because there was no consideration.
D) There was an enforceable agreement because all the essential terms were included.
E) There was not an enforceable agreement because the price of the shares had changed significantly after the initial offer to purchase was made
D
You might also like to view...
An arrangement in which the owner of real property sells property to a purchaser and extends credit to the purchaser is known as ________
A) a lien release B) a credit release C) accommodation D) land sales contract
To succeed in a claim of passing off the plaintiff must prove that the public would be confused and the plaintiff suffered economic losses or damage to their goodwill
Indicate whether the statement is true or false