Which of the following is an example of an ex post facto fallacy?
A) Since A and B are related, you assume that A caused B.
B) Since the manipulation of the independent variable A results in a consistent change in the dependent variable B, you assume that the change in A causes the change in B.
C) Since no correlation between A and B is found, you assume that there is no causal relationship between A and B.
D) Since only a contingency between A and B is established, you assume that there is no causal connection between A and B.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements concerning jurisdiction is false?
a. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to try a case first. b. About half the cases in the United States are heard by federal courts. c. Appellate jurisdiction refers to those cases a court hears on appeal. d. Almost all the cases heard by the Supreme Court come to it on appeal. e. The vast majority of losers in federal court cases accept the verdict without appeal.
In a general sense, what are evaluative criteria, and what is their value to policy makers attempting to choose the best policy options?
What will be an ideal response?