Mr. Marsh is anxious to begin his research study, and he jumps right in without gaining approval of his study through the IRB. Additionally, he has not asked his research subjects to sign a consent form
The study is not being sponsored by any federal agency or through the Food and Drug Administration. What are the legal and ethical implications of Mr. Marsh's actions?
What will be an ideal response?
The research is not legally required to have IRB approval, but ethically it is. Additionally, his peers may not accept his research without it meeting professional standards of human subject protection. Mr. Marsh is bound by ethical codes including
the Nuremburg Code to protect his study subjects.
You might also like to view...
Which of these was NOT part of the Cold War?
A) The division of Yugoslavia B) The splitting of Germany into eastern and western parts C) The division of Korea into North and South D) The establishment of communist governments in Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, and Czechoslovakia E) The erection of the Berlin Wall
The large geographical size of Texas
A) ?means that campaigning for statewide political office requires a significant investment of resources. B) ?reduces the need for candidates to raise campaign contributions. C) ?makes the use of social media unnecessary and rare in political campaigns. D) ?results in more senators from Texas in the U.S. Senate than from smaller states.