The median is determined by summing all the items in a group and dividing by the number of items.

Can the United States offer a values-based defense of its refusal to sign the treaty? What might that defense be?

What will be an ideal response?

What kind of fallacy of reason does a politician engage in when he or she tries to answer a question with something that is not relevant?

A) ad hominem B) post hoc, ergo propter hoc C) slippery slope D) hasty generalization E) red herring argument