Describe the Supreme Court's decision in National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Sebelius, and evaluate its significance for federalism in the United States
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Identify this case as the one challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.
2. Describe the two legal questionsâ€"whether the necessary and proper clause authorized the expansion of Medicaid and whether the commerce clause provided the authority to order individual Americans to buy health insurance.
3. Explain the Supreme Court's decision on both of these questions. In the case of the first question, the Court ruled that states had to be given the option to accept federal money or continue running the program as usual. In the case of the second question, the Court ruled that the commerce clause could not be used to force individuals to purchase an unwanted product.
4. Evaluate the consequences of this decision for American federalism. In particular, note that while the Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, it still limited the federal government's authority over the states.
You might also like to view...
Although cotton was the principal export of Texas well into the twentieth century, in terms of the self-image of Texans, the myth and imagination of the frontier has been far more important than cotton farming
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
According to liberal economic theory, interdependence tends to
a. make war more expensive, since your "enemy" may be your economic partner. b. raise the possibility of war due to proximity to your enemy. c. increase the likelihood of conflict as economic competition raises tensions. d. make little difference on whether a country enters into a conflict with another country.